George Orwell Essay

A comparison between monster hard times & Orwells 1984 I am writing roughly 2 novels that seem to come across as very different. Orwells novel portraying a nightmarish image of his opinionated approaching of Britain. Where as heller novel creates a vision to represent Victorian education over 150 years ago. two of these storylines dehumanise and regulate a participation, both of very different kinds. Charles Dickens and George Orwells novels differ in the recreation of the society and in the plot of the actual storyline.The ingenuousness of the children and the bleak severity of the head instructor is what dickens focuses on to boasting his thoughts of Victorian schools. In which Orwell depicts a society where everything is bleak and distraught and driven by a soulless fellowship, unfit fellow. Further more than both novels were written at totally different generations, Dickens cosmos the Victorian times and Orwells being the mid nineteen hundreds. patronage all the se issues that divide the novels apart they seem to come across as very standardized.Within closer inspection of the novels they seem to both gibe and authorise their societies. Orwell has utilize an empowering character as his leader he has created a party lead by BIG BROTHER. Where as in Dickens approach to create a leader he has used a less excessive and extreme character called Mr Gradgrind, the head teacher who only implicates facts. Although he whitethorn not be as demanding as Orwells approach, he uses satire to dissolve the pupils mentality. Both of these characters apply a very dominating perspective towards there audience and offer them no thought and identity.Girl number 20 6079 metalworker Both authors have produced an atmosphere where people who atomic number 18 commanded by them, are clarified as mindless objects rather than individuals with an imagination. This strips them d witness in the mouth to postcode moreover factorised minds in one case, and an imagina tion that hardly existed in Orwells novel. In an extract from Hard times, the author disembowels the imagination of the students and use the brain of Morgiana & the 40 thieves. Not unlike Morgiana looking into all the vessels ranged before him This gives an mind of Mr Gradgrind pouring the facts from his factorised mind, into the students damaged imagination. This canvasss with Orwells approach, where BIG BROTHER brutally demolishes the wide imagination and thought, as they suffer in a decayed dystopia. An superfluous contrast linking the novels to riseher is, the stern and domineering party in both societies. The BIG BROTHER party fiercenesses the issue of them surveying the society of the party members and this is persistently repeated in the novel.In which Mr Gradgrind constantly stresses the importance of facts and crushes the childrens minds, until they grasp the significance of facts. In this life, we want nothing but facts, sir nothing but facts BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU These two quotations illustrate the emphasis and constant repetition of the parties. The author uses these effects to not only get the picture imprinted in the mind of the characters, but also into the readers. Furthermore, the BIG BROTHER party in Orwells novel, links very well with Dickens criticizing character, Mr Gradgrind.These two characters both contrast and appear as very similar in personality and in appearance. They both are displayed with a baptistry that jolts the reader, and creates in their imagination a daunting and depressing figure. The black-moustachioed face gazed down while the dark eyeball looked into Winstons own While his eyes found commodious cellarage in two dark caves, over funny by the wall The first quotation is Orwell showing his opinion of BIG BROTHER gazing with fear, and this compares extremely well with dickens attempt to create the corresponding sort of atmosphere.Dickens expresses more scarce by using a metaphor to show his view of a leade r, he also goes into more detail about the bold figure of Mr Gradgrind. Not only do they link well in appearance, but also in attitude towards their society. Both seem to dictate, and show immense power on the regulations of their own society. In conclusion, I feel that both authors have created a society and atmosphere that both link together and show many similarities.Although they may well both show differences, they dont even compare with the shear amount of evidence that link the novels together. Each author has created authority, delay and power to create an atmosphere that can dictate a unscathed society. In this case the societies are very alike and the tone of address used by each author is much the same. In my opinion, these two novels equally portray a society that can create a vision for the reader to see a glimpse of the past or what may be a glimpse of the future.